When a marriage involving foreign nationals breaks down in Turkey, one of the first legal questions that arises is which country’s courts have jurisdiction and which country’s law will govern the custody determination. The Turkish Private International and Procedural Law, known as MÖHUK (Law No. 5718), provides the framework for resolving these questions. Under Article 14 of MÖHUK, the grounds and provisions for divorce and separation shall be governed by the common national law of the spouses. If the spouses hold different nationalities, the law of their common habitual residence shall apply. In the absence of a common habitual residence, Turkish law shall apply.
This provision has significant implications for custody matters. If both spouses are nationals of the same foreign country, the family law of that country will generally govern the divorce and its consequences, including child custody. However, if the spouses hold different nationalities and have been living together in Turkey, Turkish family law will typically apply as the law of their common habitual residence. In cases where there is no common habitual residence at all, the Turkish Civil Code becomes the default governing law.
It is important to note that even when a foreign law governs the substantive divorce, Turkish courts retain the authority to apply Turkish mandatory rules regarding child protection and custody. This means that certain protective measures under Turkish law cannot be overridden by a foreign governing law, particularly when the child’s welfare is at stake.
The Best Interest of the Child Standard
Turkish family courts determine custody based on a single overriding principle: the best interest of the child, referred to in Turkish law as çocuğun üstün yararı. Article 182 of the Turkish Civil Code (TMK) sets out the framework for custody arrangements upon divorce. Under this provision, the court shall decide ex officio on the custody of the children born during the marriage, the personal relationship between the children and the other parent, and the contribution of the parents to the costs of care and education of the children.
This standard applies equally to Turkish citizens and foreign nationals. The nationality of the parents plays no role in the court’s custody assessment. Turkish judges evaluate a range of factors when determining what arrangement serves the child’s best interest. These factors include the emotional bond between the child and each parent, the parenting capacity and living conditions offered by each parent, the stability and continuity of the child’s social environment, any history of domestic violence or neglect, the child’s health and educational needs, and the willingness of each parent to facilitate the child’s relationship with the other parent.
For younger children, particularly those in early childhood, Turkish courts have historically shown a tendency to award custody to the mother. This is not a rigid legal rule but rather a judicial practice rooted in the understanding that very young children have a particular need for maternal care and attachment. However, this presumption is rebuttable, and courts will award custody to the father where the circumstances demonstrate that doing so better serves the child’s welfare.
Joint Custody in Turkey
One question frequently asked by foreign nationals is whether Turkish law allows joint custody. Historically, the Turkish legal system did not recognize joint custody, and Turkish courts consistently awarded sole custody to one parent while granting the other parent visitation rights. This changed following Turkey’s ratification of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights, which was published in the Official Gazette on 25 March 2016 under Law No. 6684.
Following this ratification, the Court of Cassation (Yargıtay) 2nd Civil Chamber issued a landmark decision on 20 February 2017 (Case No. 2016/15771 E., 2017/1737 K.), in which it held that a joint custody arrangement cannot be said to be manifestly contrary to Turkish public order or to violate the fundamental structure and essential interests of Turkish society. This decision opened the door to joint custody arrangements in Turkish law, particularly in uncontested divorce cases where both parents agree on shared custody.
In practice, joint custody remains more common in uncontested divorces where the spouses include a joint custody clause in their divorce protocol. Even where joint custody is agreed upon, the protocol must specify which parent the child will primarily reside with and how the child’s time with the other parent will be arranged. The court retains the authority to reject a joint custody arrangement if it determines that the arrangement does not serve the child’s best interest.
The Role of MÖHUK in International Custody Cases
For foreign nationals, the interaction between Turkish domestic family law and private international law adds a layer of complexity to custody proceedings. MÖHUK not only determines the applicable substantive law but also governs issues of jurisdiction. Turkish courts have jurisdiction over custody matters when the defendant spouse is domiciled in Turkey, when both spouses are habitually resident in Turkey, or when the divorce case itself is filed in a Turkish court.
Article 17 of MÖHUK addresses the law applicable to parent-child relationships, including custody. Under this provision, the relationship between parents and children shall be governed by the law of their common habitual residence; in the absence of a common habitual residence, the law of the child’s habitual residence shall apply. This means that in most cases involving foreign families living in Turkey, Turkish family law will govern the custody determination, regardless of the parents’ nationalities.
Foreign nationals should also be aware that Turkish courts may apply Turkish mandatory rules on child protection even when a foreign law governs the divorce. These mandatory rules include provisions relating to interim custody measures, travel restrictions, and protective orders designed to safeguard the child’s welfare during and after the proceedings.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Custody Orders
A foreign custody order does not automatically have legal effect in Turkey. Under Articles 50 to 59 of MÖHUK, foreign court judgments, including custody orders, must be recognized and enforced through a formal procedure before a Turkish family court known as tanıma ve tenfiz. This process requires the applicant to demonstrate that the foreign court had jurisdiction under the law of the country where the judgment was rendered, that the judgment is final and enforceable in the country of origin, that the judgment does not violate Turkish public order, and that the defendant was properly served and given an opportunity to defend.
This recognition procedure is particularly important for foreign parents who obtained a custody order in their home country and wish to have it enforced in Turkey. Without going through the recognition process, a foreign custody order carries no legal weight in Turkish courts, and attempting to rely on it without formal recognition may result in delays and legal complications.
The Hague Convention and International Child Abduction
Turkey is a signatory to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which entered into force for Turkey on 1 August 2000. This Convention provides a civil mechanism for the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed from or retained outside their country of habitual residence in violation of custody rights. The Convention applies to children under the age of 16 and requires that both the country from which the child was removed and the country to which the child was taken are Contracting States.
The Turkish Ministry of Justice serves as the Central Authority for Hague Convention applications in Turkey. When an application is received, the Ministry forwards it to the relevant Public Prosecutor, who then initiates proceedings before the competent family court. The Convention is designed to be applied expeditiously, although in practice, proceedings in Turkey can take longer than the six-week target set by the Convention.
Foreign parents facing a situation where a child has been wrongfully taken to or retained in Turkey should act promptly. Filing a Hague Convention application as soon as possible is critical, as delays can affect the outcome. If more than one year passes from the date of the wrongful removal or retention before the application is filed, the court may refuse to order the child’s return if the child has become settled in the new environment.
It should be noted that the Hague Convention does not determine custody. Its sole purpose is to restore the status quo by returning the child to the country of habitual residence so that the courts of that country can make a custody determination on the merits.
Practical Considerations for Foreign Parents
Foreign nationals involved in custody proceedings in Turkey face certain practical challenges that Turkish citizens do not. One of the most important steps is to retain a Turkish family lawyer who can navigate the procedural requirements of the Turkish court system. Foreign parents who are unable to attend hearings in person may appoint their lawyer through a power of attorney, which can be issued at a Turkish consulate abroad.
All foreign documents submitted to a Turkish court must be accompanied by a certified Turkish translation prepared by a sworn translator. Documents such as birth certificates, marriage certificates, and any existing foreign court orders should be apostilled or authenticated through the relevant consular channels before submission.
Foreign parents should also be aware that Turkish courts may impose travel restrictions on the child during ongoing custody proceedings. These restrictions are intended to prevent the child from being taken out of Turkey before the court has issued a final custody decision. In cases involving a risk of international child abduction, the court may order that the child’s passport be surrendered to the court.
Another important consideration is the enforcement of child support obligations. Under Turkish law, the parent who does not have custody is required to contribute to the child’s maintenance through a payment known as iştirak nafakası. This obligation applies regardless of the paying parent’s nationality and is enforceable through Turkish courts.
Attorney Ozan Soylu – Turkish Divorce Lawyer
Attorney Ozan Soylu, founder of Soylu Law Firm, provides legal representation in divorce and custody cases for both Turkish and foreign nationals. With experience in international family law disputes, contested and uncontested divorce proceedings, and cross-border custody matters, Attorney Soylu assists clients in navigating the complexities of the Turkish family court system. Soylu Law Firm is based in Istanbul, Turkey.
For all legal matters concerning Turkish law, you can reach out to Attorney Ozan Soylu. Legal consultancy and representation services are provided with a dedicated approach for foreign nationals. To submit your questions, contact us.
Leave a Comment